Now that the Boy Scouts of America has adopted a new policy of accepting openly gay youth (though not gay adults as leaders), lifetime scouts, including those who earned the coveted Eagle Scout Award, are renouncing their scout membership. Conservative churches that have sponsored scout troops are cutting their ties. The Southern Baptists and the Assemblies of God are predicting the eminent demise of scouting as they facilitate an exodus of young boys from the program.
But scouting has been hemorrhaging members for decades. Since its peak in 1972, scouting membership has declined by 40%. As the BSA searches desperately for a way to reverse this trend, it finds itself on the horns of a dilemma. It has fallen victim to the social polarization that is tearing apart our national fabric.
Boys Scouts are not politically, ideologically, or religiously biased. In the time I served as a scout leader when my boys were younger, I observed that scouting brings together two different interests. On the one hand, it’s a youth group that promotes good citizenship. On the other hand, it teaches young men how to respect, enjoy, and survive in the outdoors. But the BSA has never sought to take controversial stands on any issue or favor one religious tradition over another. And the awkward policy change that has resulted from the debate over sexual orientation reflects how the BSA has tried to stay out of the fray.
In an official statement, BSA leadership stated that the new policy is “reflective of the beliefs of most of scouting’s major religious chartered organizations.” That is, churches do not turn away young people for saying they are attracted to the same sex, especially if they are not engaged in sexual activity, so why should the Boy Scouts? Both supporters and critics of the change point out the inconsistency of