I guess the most exciting news in the Christian world right
now is the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the imminent selection of his
successor. I admit that, as a
Protestant, I don’t feel the same anticipation as many of my neighbors. I was listening to a local radio station in
the car on the day after Benedict announced he was stepping down, and the DJ
said with enthusiastic surprise, “Wow, so we’re going to get a new Pope!” My immediate thought was, “I’m not getting a new Pope. I’ve never had one.” But I do understand the significance of
choosing the leader of over a billion Christians worldwide.
As Catholicism ponders this historic moment – the first papal resignation in 600 years – I am intrigued by two proposals that have been advanced by two prominent and very public, albeit not very traditional, Catholics. The first is from Garry Wills, the historian and practicing Catholic who has written books about Jesus, Paul, the gospels, baptism, and other Christian themes. Wills latest book, Why Priests?: A Failed Tradition, debunks pretty thoroughly the entire biblical basis for the Catholic priesthood, using many of the same arguments first offered by Reformer Martin Luther in the 16th century. Wills says that the power of the priesthood is the result of the doctrine of transubstantiation, developed by Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, which transformed the Eucharist into a magical ceremony in which bread and wine literally became the body and blood of Christ. Since only priests could effect this change in substance, Wills says, the priesthood took on new importance for the Catholic mass.
Wills’ purpose, he says, is not to propose the end of the Catholic priesthood but rather to assure practicing Catholics that they should not be discouraged by the current shortage of priests. Their faith, he insists, does not depend on the priesthood, but on the gathered community (a very Protestant idea).
Continue reading "A More Protestant Future for Catholicism? Not Likely." »